A counterexample for equivalence result between tails behavior and Grand Lebesgue Spaces norms
E. Ostrovsky, L. Sirota

TL;DR
This paper presents counterexamples demonstrating that tails behavior and Grand Lebesgue Spaces norms can differ for certain classes of random variables, challenging assumptions of their equivalence.
Contribution
It provides the first known counterexamples highlighting the distinction between tails behavior and Grand Lebesgue Spaces norms.
Findings
Counterexamples show non-equivalence between tails and norms
Tails behavior and norms can diverge for some random variables
Challenges existing assumptions in probability theory
Abstract
We bring in this short report (counter -) examples on order to show a difference between tails behavior and Grand Lebesgue Spaces norms for some classes of random variables.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsProbability and Risk Models · Approximation Theory and Sequence Spaces · Advanced Harmonic Analysis Research
