From randomness in two symbols to randomness in three symbols
Ariel Zylber

TL;DR
This paper explores how to insert new symbols into infinite sequences to preserve their normality, extending the concept from fixed alphabets to expanded ones with additional symbols.
Contribution
It introduces methods for inserting symbols into normal words to maintain normality over larger alphabets, addressing a dual problem to subsequence selection.
Findings
Established procedures for symbol insertion preserving normality
Extended normality concepts to expanded alphabets with new symbols
Provided explicit constructions for normal words over larger alphabets
Abstract
In 1909 Borel defined normality as a notion of randomness of the digits of the representation of a real number over certain base (fractional expansion). If we think the representation of a number over a base as an infinite sequence of symbols from a finite alphabet , we can define normality directly for words of symbols of : A word is normal to the alphabet if every finite block of symbols from appears with the same asymptotic frequency in as every other block of the same length. Many examples of normal words have been found since its definition, being Champernowne in 1933 the first to show an explicit and simple instance. Moreover, it has been characterized how we can select subsequences of a normal word preserving its normality, always leaving the alphabet fixed. In this work we consider the dual problem which consists of inserting symbols in infinite…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · semigroups and automata theory · Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
