The zero-point energy of elementary quantum fields
Gerold Gr\"undler

TL;DR
This paper reviews seven arguments regarding the zero-point energy of elementary quantum fields, concluding that the arguments against its divergence are significantly stronger than those supporting it.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive assessment of all existing arguments for and against the zero-point energy divergence in quantum fields, clarifying their relative strengths.
Findings
The contra arguments are overwhelmingly stronger than the pro arguments.
The paper clarifies the debate on zero-point energy divergence.
It suggests reconsidering the assumption of diverging zero-point energy.
Abstract
Since 1925, exactly four arguments have been forwarded for the assumption of a diverging (respectively --- after regularization --- very huge) zero-point energy of elementary quantum fields. And exactly three arguments have been forwarded against this assumption. In this article, all seven arguments are reviewed and assessed. It turns out that the three CONTRA arguments against the assumption of that zero-point energy are overwhelmingly stronger than the four PRO arguments.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories · Black Holes and Theoretical Physics · Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
