Interpreting Brightness Asymmetries in Transition Disks: Vortex at Dead Zone or Planet Carved Gap Edges?
Zs. Regaly, A. Juhasz, D. Nehez

TL;DR
This study compares vortex formation at planet-carved gap edges and dead zone edges in protoplanetary disks using hydrodynamic simulations, revealing differences in vortex longevity, morphology, and observability with ALMA.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of vortex characteristics in two formation scenarios, highlighting observable differences to distinguish their origins.
Findings
Vortices at dead zone edges are longer-lived than those at planetary gap edges.
Vortex size and shape differ significantly between the two scenarios.
ALMA observations can potentially identify vortex formation mechanisms based on brightness asymmetries.
Abstract
Recent sub-millimeter observations show non-axisymmetric brightness distributions with a horseshoe-like morphology for more than a dozen transition disks. The most accepted explanation for the observed asymmetries is the accumulation of dust in large-scale vortices. Protoplanetary disks vortices can form by the excitation of Rossby-wave instability in the vicinity of a steep pressure gradient, which can develop at the edges of a giant planet carved gap or at the edges of an accretionally inactive zone. We studied the formation and evolution of vortices formed in these two distinct scenarios by means of two-dimensional locally isothermal hydrodynamic simulations. We found that the vortex formed at the edge of a planetary gap is short-lived, unless the disk is nearly inviscid. In contrast, the vortex formed at the outer edge of a dead zone is long-lived. The vortex morphology can be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
