Quantum Communication Uplink to a 3U CubeSat: Feasibility & Design
Sebastian Philipp Neumann, Siddarth Koduru Joshi, Matthias Fink,, Thomas Scheidl, Roland Blach, Carsten Scharlemann, Sameh Abouagaga, Daanish, Bambery, Erik Kerstel, Mathieu Barthelemy, Rupert Ursin

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates the feasibility of a compact 3U CubeSat for quantum communication uplinks, showing it can achieve performance comparable to larger satellites using off-the-shelf components and advanced pointing technology.
Contribution
It provides a detailed design and feasibility analysis for a small CubeSat quantum communication uplink, highlighting cost-effective solutions and performance optimization.
Findings
Achieved comparable performance to larger satellites with a 3U CubeSat
Developed a comprehensive link budget and simulation for secure key rates
Outlined design trade-offs to optimize cost and performance
Abstract
Satellites are the efficient way to achieve global scale quantum communication (Q.Com) because unavoidable losses restrict fiber based Q.Com to a few hundred kilometers. We demonstrate the feasibility of establishing a Q.Com uplink with a tiny 3U CubeSat (measuring just 10X10X32 cm^3 ) using commercial off-the-shelf components, the majority of which have space heritage. We demonstrate how to leverage the latest advancements in nano-satellite body-pointing to show that our 4kg CubeSat can provide performance comparable to much larger 600kg satellite missions. A comprehensive link budget and simulation was performed to calculate the secure key rates. We discuss design choices and trade-offs to maximize the key rate while minimizing the cost and development needed. Our detailed design and feasibility study can be readily used as a template for global scale Q.Com.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
