On the $q$-Bentness of Boolean Functions
Zhixiong Chen, Ting Gu, Andrew Klapper

TL;DR
This paper proves Klapper's conjecture that no Boolean function can have $q$-transform coefficients of magnitude $2^{n/2}$, by analyzing partial difference sets, and introduces almost $q$-bent functions as a near approximation.
Contribution
The paper confirms Klapper's conjecture for all $n$ by proving the nonexistence of $q$-bent functions through group-theoretic analysis and introduces the concept of almost $q$-bent functions.
Findings
No $q$-bent functions exist for any non-constant $q$.
The proof involves the nonexistence of certain partial difference sets.
A new class of functions called almost $q$-bent functions is introduced.
Abstract
For each non-constant in the set of -variable Boolean functions, the {\em -transform} of a Boolean function is related to the Hamming distances from to the functions obtainable from by nonsingular linear change of basis. Klapper conjectured that no Boolean function exists with its -transform coefficients equal to (such function is called -bent). In our early work, we only gave partial results to confirm this conjecture for small . Here we prove thoroughly that the conjecture is true by investigating the nonexistence of the partial difference sets in Abelian groups with special parameters. We also introduce a new family of functions called almost -bent functions, which are close to -bentness.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCoding theory and cryptography · graph theory and CDMA systems · Cellular Automata and Applications
