Transient and Slim versus Recurrent and Fat: Random Walks and the Trees they Grow
Giulio Iacobelli, Daniel R. Figueiredo, Giovanni Neglia

TL;DR
This paper analyzes a novel network growth model driven by a random walk that builds a tree, revealing a fundamental dichotomy between transience and recurrence and between different degree distributions depending on the walk parameter.
Contribution
It introduces and rigorously analyzes the No Restart Random Walk (NRRW) model, highlighting the impact of walk parameters on network structure and walk behavior.
Findings
For s=1, the walk is transient with bounded node degrees.
For even s, the walk is recurrent with power-law degree distribution.
The fraction of leaves approaches one as the network grows for s=2.
Abstract
Network growth models that embody principles such as preferential attachment and local attachment rules have received much attention over the last decade. Among various approaches, random walks have been leveraged to capture such principles. In this paper we consider the No Restart Random Walk (NRRW) model where a walker builds its graph (tree) while moving around. In particular, the walker takes s steps (a parameter) on the current graph. A new node with degree one is added to the graph and connected to the node currently occupied by the walker. The walker then resumes, taking another s steps, and the process repeats. We analyze this process from the perspective of the walker and the network, showing a fundamental dichotomy between transience and recurrence for the walker as well as power law and exponential degree distribution for the network. More precisely, we prove the following…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
