A logic for temporal conditionals and a solution to the Sea Battle Puzzle
Fengkui Ju, Gianluca Grilletti, Valentin Goranko

TL;DR
This paper introduces a branching-time logic LTC for formalizing temporal conditionals, providing a solution to the Sea Battle puzzle by preventing fatalistic conclusions through domain restriction semantics.
Contribution
It develops a new logic LTC extending CTL* with model update operators and semantics that address the complexity of temporal conditionals, solving the Sea Battle puzzle.
Findings
LTC logic formalizes temporal conditionals with domain restrictions.
The logic renders the Sea Battle argument unsound, resolving the fatalism issue.
A complete axiomatization reduces the decision problem to modal logic KD.
Abstract
Temporal reasoning with conditionals is more complex than both classical temporal reasoning and reasoning with timeless conditionals, and can lead to some rather counter-intuitive conclusions. For instance, Aristotle's famous "Sea Battle Tomorrow" puzzle leads to a fatalistic conclusion: whether there will be a sea battle tomorrow or not, but that is necessarily the case now. We propose a branching-time logic LTC to formalise reasoning about temporal conditionals and provide that logic with adequate formal semantics. The logic LTC extends the Nexttime fragment of CTL*, with operators for model updates, restricting the domain to only future moments where antecedent is still possible to satisfy. We provide formal semantics for these operators that implements the restrictor interpretation of antecedents of temporalized conditionals, by suitably restricting the domain of discourse. As a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
