Stability of the coexistent superconducting-nematic phase under the presence of intersite interactions
Micha{\l} Zegrodnik, J\'ozef Spa{\l}ek

TL;DR
This paper investigates how intersite interactions affect the stability of coexisting superconducting and nematic phases in extended Hubbard and $t$-$J$-$U$ models, using advanced diagrammatic methods to go beyond mean-field approximations.
Contribution
It systematically analyzes the impact of intersite Coulomb and exchange interactions on the SC+N phase stability using the DE-GWF approach, including higher-order effects and comparison with RMFT.
Findings
Exchange interaction enhances superconductivity and suppresses nematicity.
Intersite Coulomb repulsion opposes the effects of exchange interaction.
Nematic phase does not survive in the $t$-$J$-$U$ model with realistic $J$ values.
Abstract
We analyze the effect of intersite-interaction terms on the stability of the coexisting superconucting-nematic phase (SC+N) within the extended Hubbard and -- models on the square lattice. In order to take into account the correlation effects with a proper precision, we use the approach based on the \textit{diagrammatic expansion of the Gutzwiller wave function} (DE-GWF), which goes beyond the renormalized mean field theory (RMFT) in a systematic manner. As a starting point of our analysis we discuss the stability region of the SC+N phase on the intrasite Coulomb repulsion-hole doping plane for the case of the Hubbard model. Next, we show that the exchange interaction term enhances superconductivity while suppresses the nematicity, whereas the intersite Coulomb repulsion term acts in the opposite manner. The competing character of the SC and N phases interplay is clearly…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
