Against the biases in spins and shapes of asteroids

TL;DR

This paper addresses biases in asteroid lightcurve data by conducting a survey on underrepresented bright main-belt asteroids with long periods and low amplitudes, revealing new rotation periods and emphasizing the need to account for selection effects.

Contribution

It introduces a targeted survey to reduce biases in asteroid spin and shape data, discovering new rotation periods for a subset of underrepresented asteroids.

Findings

A quarter of studied asteroids have different rotation periods than previously accepted.

New period values are published for 8 out of 34 targets.

Biases significantly affect current understanding of asteroid spin and shape distributions.

Abstract

Physical studies of asteroids depend on an availability of lightcurve data. Targets that are easy to observe and analyse naturally have more data available, so their synodic periods are confirmed from multiple sources. Also, thanks to availability of data from a number of apparitions, their spin and shape models can often be obtained. Almost half of bright (H<=11 mag) main-belt asteroid population with known lightcurve parameters have rotation periods considered long (P>12 hours) and are rarely chosen for photometric observations. There is a similar selection effect against asteroids with low lightcurve amplitudes (a_max<=0.25 mag). As a result such targets, though numerous in this brightness range, are underrepresented in the sample of spin and shape modelled asteroids. In the range of fainter targets such effects are stronger. These selection effects can influence what is now known about asteroid spin vs. size distribution, on asteroid internal structure and densities and on spatial orientation of asteroid spin axes. To reduce both biases at the same time, we started a photometric survey of a substantial sample of those bright main-belt asteroids that displayed both features: periods longer than 12 hours, and amplitudes that did not exceed 0.25 magnitude. First we aim at finding synodic periods of rotation, and after a few observed apparitions, obtaining spin and shape models. As an initial result of our survey we found that a quarter of the studied sample (8 out of 34 targets) have rotation periods different from those widely accepted. We publish here these newly found period values with the lightcurves. The size/frequency plot might in reality look different in the long-period range. Further studies of asteroid spins, shapes, and structure should take into account serious biases that are present in the parameters available today.