How well do reduced models capture the dynamics in models of interacting neurons ?
Yao Li, Logan Chariker, Lai-Sang Young

TL;DR
This paper evaluates how effectively simplified reduced models replicate the complex dynamics of interacting neuron networks, highlighting the roles of spike correlations and nonlinearities in discrepancies.
Contribution
It introduces stochastic neuron models and compares them with simple reduced models, identifying key mechanisms behind differences in firing rate predictions.
Findings
Correlations in spiking cause discrepancies in firing rates.
Nonlinearities in membrane potential dynamics contribute to model differences.
Random walk models effectively reproduce membrane potential fluctuations.
Abstract
This paper introduces a class of stochastic models of interacting neurons with emergent dynamics similar to those seen in local cortical populations, and compares them to very simple reduced models driven by the same mean excitatory and inhibitory currents. Discrepancies in firing rates between network and reduced models were investigated, and mechanisms leading to these discrepancies were identified. Chief among them is correlations in spiking, or partial synchronization, working in concert with "nonlinearities" in the time evolution of membrane potentials. Additionally, simple random walk models and their first passage times were shown to reproduce well fluctuations in neuronal membrane potentials and interspike times.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
