General Physical Properties of CGRaBS Blazars
Vaidehi S. Paliya, L. Marcotulli, M. Ajello, M. Joshi, S., Sahayanathan, A. R. Rao, and D. Hartmann

TL;DR
This study analyzes the physical properties of a large sample of blazars, comparing gamma-ray loud and quiet types, revealing differences in brightness, jet efficiency, and potential for future MeV observations.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive multi-frequency analysis of blazars, applying a synchrotron inverse-Compton model to derive physical parameters and compare gamma-ray loud and quiet populations.
Findings
Gamma-ray loud blazars are brighter in radio and X-ray bands.
Gamma-ray loud blazars exhibit higher Doppler boosting and jet radiative efficiency.
Gamma-ray quiet blazars are more MeV-peaked and potential targets for future missions.
Abstract
We present the results of a multi-frequency, time-averaged analysis of blazars included in the Candidate Gamma-ray Blazar Survey catalog. Our sample consists of 324 -ray detected (-ray loud) and 191 non -ray detected (-ray quiet) blazars, and we consider all the data up to 2016 April 1. We find that both the -ray loud and the -ray quiet blazar populations occupy similar regions in the WISE color-color diagram, and in the radio and X-ray bands -ray loud sources are brighter. A simple one-zone synchrotron inverse-Compton emission model is applied to derive the physical properties of both populations. We find that the central black hole mass and the accretion disk luminosity () computed from the modeling of the optical-UV emission with a Shakura-Sunyaev disk reasonably matches with that estimated from the optical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
