TL;DR
This paper develops new causal inference methods for interference settings with cluster and population-level treatments, accounting for covariates and treatment dependence, and applies these methods to environmental policy evaluation.
Contribution
It introduces novel estimands and unbiased estimators for realistic treatment allocation programs considering covariates and dependence, extending existing causal inference frameworks.
Findings
Proposed estimators are unbiased and asymptotically normal.
Applied methods to assess power plant emission reduction effects.
Extended causal inference to population-level interventions.
Abstract
Interference arises when an individual's potential outcome depends on the individual treatment level, but also on the treatment level of others. A common assumption in the causal inference literature in the presence of interference is partial interference, implying that the population can be partitioned in clusters of individuals whose potential outcomes only depend on the treatment of units within the same cluster. Previous literature has defined average potential outcomes under counterfactual scenarios where treatments are randomly allocated to units within a cluster. However, within clusters there may be units that are more or less likely to receive treatment based on covariates or neighbors' treatment. We define new estimands that describe average potential outcomes for realistic counterfactual treatment allocation programs, extending existing estimands to take into consideration…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
