Baryon Content in a Sample of 91 Galaxy Clusters Selected by the South Pole Telescope at 0.2 < z < 1.25
I. Chiu, J. J. Mohr, M. McDonald, S. Bocquet, S. Desai, M. Klein, H., Israel, M. L. N. Ashby, A. Stanford, B. A. Benson, M. Brodwin, T. M. C., Abbott, F. B. Abdalla, S. Allam, J. Annis, M. Bayliss, A. Benoit-L\'evy, E., Bertin, L. Bleem, D. Brooks, E. Buckley-Geer, E. Bulbul

TL;DR
This study measures the baryon content in 91 galaxy clusters across redshifts 0.2 to 1.25, revealing how baryonic components scale with mass and remain relatively constant over 9 billion years, highlighting the distribution of baryons in clusters and the field.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of baryon mass components in galaxy clusters over a wide redshift range, with detailed mass scaling relations and insights into baryon distribution.
Findings
Significant deviations from self-similarity in mass scaling for all baryonic components.
Baryon content at fixed mass shows little evolution over 9 Gyr.
Evidence for 'missing baryons' outside cluster virial regions.
Abstract
We estimate total mass (), intracluster medium (ICM) mass () and stellar mass () in a Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect (SZE) selected sample of 91 galaxy clusters with masses and redshift from the 2500 deg South Pole Telescope SPT-SZ survey. The total masses are estimated from the SZE observable, the ICM masses are obtained from the analysis of X-ray observations, and the stellar masses are derived by fitting spectral energy distribution templates to Dark Energy Survey (DES) optical photometry and or near-infrared photometry. We study trends in the stellar mass, the ICM mass, the total baryonic mass and the cold baryonic fraction with cluster mass and redshift. We find significant departures from self-similarity in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
