A Paradox about Likelihood Ratios?
Louis Lyons

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether the asymptotic distribution of the log-likelihood ratio test statistic is Gaussian or chi-squared, using two simple examples to shed light on this distinction.
Contribution
It provides new insights into the conditions under which the log-likelihood ratio test statistic follows Gaussian or chi-squared distributions.
Findings
Examples illustrate the divergence from classical assumptions
Clarifies when Gaussian vs. chi-squared distributions apply
Highlights potential paradox in likelihood ratio testing
Abstract
We consider whether the asymptotic distributions for the log-likelihood ratio test statistic are expected to be Gaussian or chi-squared. Two straightforward examples provide insight on the difference.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods and Inference · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference · Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
