Non-unital polygraphs form a presheaf category
Simon Henry

TL;DR
This paper proves that the category of non-unital polygraphs is a presheaf category, introduces a new criterion for such proofs, and discusses implications for higher category theory and related conjectures.
Contribution
It establishes that non-unital polygraphs form a presheaf category and develops a new criterion for proving presheaf structures in polygraph classes.
Findings
Non-unital polygraphs form a presheaf category.
A new criterion for presheaf category proofs is introduced.
Application of the criterion to various classes of polygraphs.
Abstract
We prove, as claimed by A.Carboni and P.T.Johnstone, that the category of non-unital polygraphs, i.e. polygraphs where the source and target of each generator are not identity arrows, is a presheaf category. More generally we develop a new criterion for proving that certain classes of polygraphs are presheaf categories. This criterion also applies to the larger class of polygraphs where only the source of each generator is not an identity, and to the class of "many-to-one polygraphs", producing a new, more direct, proof that this is a presheaf category. The criterion itself seems to be extendable to more general type of operads over possibly different combinatorics, but we leave this question for future work. In an appendix we explain why this result is relevant if one wants to fix the arguments of a famous paper of M.Kapranov and V.Voevodsky and make them into a proof of C.Simpson's…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRings, Modules, and Algebras · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
