Equivalences of Graded Categories
Cain Edie-Michell

TL;DR
This paper classifies G-graded extensions of fusion categories, showing an action of automorphism groups on these extensions and establishing criteria for their equivalence, with applications to understanding their structure.
Contribution
It extends classification techniques for G-graded extensions of fusion categories and introduces an action of automorphism groups on these extensions, linking them via monoidal equivalence.
Findings
Group action of Aut(G)×Aut_⊗(C) on G-graded extensions
Equivalent extensions lie in the same orbit of this group action
Reproves classification of graded extensions using graphical calculus
Abstract
We further the techniques developed by Etingof, Nikshych, and Ostrik in order to classify the -based equivalences between two -graded extensions of . The main result of this paper (which follows from this classification) shows that there is an action of the group on the set of all -graded extensions of , and further, any two extensions in the same orbit of this action are monoidally equivalent. As a warm up for the proof of our classification result we reprove the classification of graded extensions of a fusion category, making extensive use of graphical calculus. Aside from our main result, we provide several other practical applications of our classification of -based equivalences.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models · Advanced Algebra and Logic · Rings, Modules, and Algebras
