On the difference between variational and unitary coupled cluster theories
Gaurav Harsha, Toru Shiozaki, Gustavo E. Scuseria

TL;DR
This paper conclusively demonstrates that variational and unitary coupled cluster theories produce different energies, especially under strong correlation, using the Lipkin Hamiltonian, and introduces a generalized non-unitary variant with improved performance.
Contribution
It provides conclusive numerical evidence of differences between variational and unitary coupled cluster theories and introduces a generalized non-unitary variant that outperforms traditional methods.
Findings
Variational and unitary coupled cluster theories yield different energies.
Differences are significant under strong correlation in the Lipkin model.
The generalized non-unitary variant performs best among tested methods.
Abstract
There have been assertions in the literature that the variational and unitary forms of coupled cluster theory lead to the same energy functional. Numerical evidence from previous authors was inconsistent with this claim, yet the small energy differences found between the two methods and the relatively large number of variational parameters precluded an unequivocal conclusion. Using the Lipkin Hamiltonian, we here present conclusive numerical evidence that the two theories yield different energies. The ambiguities arising from the size of the cluster parameter space are absent in the Lipkin model, particularly when truncating to double excitations. We show that in the symmetry adapted basis under strong correlation the differences between the variational and unitary models are large, whereas they yield quite similar energies in the weakly correlated regime previously explored. We also…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
