Temporal Variations of Telluric Water Vapor Absorption at Apache Point Observatory
Dan Li (1), Cullen H. Blake (1), David Nidever (2), Samuel Halverson, (1,3) ((1) University of Pennsylvania, (2) NOAO, (3) Sagan Fellow)

TL;DR
This study investigates the temporal and spatial variability of water vapor absorption at Apache Point Observatory using high-resolution near-infrared spectra, providing insights into atmospheric effects on astronomical measurements and aiding future survey planning.
Contribution
First detailed analysis of water vapor variability at APO using extensive spectral data, linking optical depths to PWV, and assessing sky homogeneity over various timescales.
Findings
PWV variation within an hour is typically less than 1 mm for most observations.
PWV is homogeneous across the sky at a given epoch within 70° for 90% of measurements within 1.5 hours.
Measurement precision of PWV is approximately ±0.11 mm.
Abstract
Time-variable absorption by water vapor in Earth's atmosphere presents an important source of systematic error for a wide range of ground-based astronomical measurements, particularly at near-infrared wavelengths. We present results from the first study on the temporal and spatial variability of water vapor absorption at Apache Point Observatory (APO). We analyze 400,000 high-resolution, near-infrared (-band) spectra of hot stars collected as calibration data for the APO Galactic Evolution Explorer (APOGEE) survey. We fit for the optical depths of telluric water vapor absorption features in APOGEE spectra and convert these optical depths to Precipitable Water Vapor (PWV) using contemporaneous data from a GPS-based PWV monitoring station at APO. Based on simultaneous measurements obtained over a 3 field of view, we estimate that our PWV measurement precision is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
