Precise weak lensing constraints from deep high-resolution $K_\mathrm{s}$ images: VLT/HAWK-I analysis of the super-massive galaxy cluster RCS2$J$232727.7$-$020437 at $z=0.70$
Tim Schrabback, Mischa Schirmer, Remco F. J. van der Burg, Henk, Hoekstra, Axel Buddendiek, Douglas Applegate, Marusa Bradac, Tim Eifler,, Thomas Erben, Michael D. Gladders, Beatriz Hern\'andez-Mart\'in, Hendrik, Hildebrandt, Austin Hoag, Dominik Klaes, Anja von der Linden

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that deep high-resolution ground-based $K_s$ imaging can achieve weak lensing sensitivity comparable to space-based observations for massive galaxy clusters at redshift around 0.7, enabling precise mass measurements.
Contribution
It shows that ground-based $K_s$ imaging with good seeing can provide weak lensing constraints similar to HST, with improved source redshift calibration and mass estimation for high-redshift clusters.
Findings
Weak lensing sensitivity comparable to HST/ACS for ground-based $K_s$ images.
Mass of the galaxy cluster RCS2J232727.7-020437 estimated at about 2.06 x 10^15 solar masses.
Cluster detected with a significance of 10.1 sigma.
Abstract
We demonstrate that deep good-seeing VLT/HAWK-I images complemented with +-band photometry can yield a sensitivity for weak lensing studies of massive galaxy clusters at redshifts \mbox{}, which is almost identical to the sensitivity of HST/ACS mosaics of single-orbit depth. Key reasons for this good performance are the excellent image quality frequently achievable for imaging from the ground, a highly effective photometric selection of background galaxies, and a galaxy ellipticity dispersion that is noticeably lower than for optically observed high-redshift galaxy samples. Incorporating results from the 3D-HST and UltraVISTA surveys we also obtained a more accurate calibration of the source redshift distribution than previously achieved for similar optical weak lensing data sets. Here we studied the extremely massive…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
