Saturation of a turbulent mixing layer over a cavity: response to harmonic forcing around mean flows

TL;DR

This study investigates how a turbulent mixing layer over a cavity responds to harmonic acoustic forcing, combining large-eddy simulations and linearised Navier-Stokes equations to understand nonlinear saturation and control strategies.

Contribution

It demonstrates that linearised Navier-Stokes equations can accurately predict nonlinear responses and saturation in a turbulent mixing layer subjected to harmonic forcing, providing insights for flow control.

Findings

LNSE accurately predicts flow amplification and saturation.

Higher harmonics have limited impact on flow amplification.

Sensitivity analysis identifies key regions for control interventions.

Abstract

Turbulent mixing layers over cavities can couple with acoustic waves and lead to undesired oscillations. To understand the nonlinear aspects of this phenomenon, a turbulent mixing layer over a deep cavity at Reynolds number 150 000 is considered and its response to harmonic forcing is analysed with large-eddy simulations (LES) and linearised Navier-Stokes equations (LNSE). As a model of incoming acoustic perturbations, spatially uniform time-harmonic forcing is applied at the cavity end, with amplitudes in the wide range 0.045-8.9% of the bulk velocity. Compressible LES provide reference nonlinear responses of the shear layer, and the associated mean flows. Linear responses are calculated with the incompressible LNSE around the LES mean flows; they predict well the amplification (both measured with kinetic energy and with a proxy for vortex sound production) and capture the nonlinear saturation observed as the forcing amplitude increases and the mixing layer thickens. Perhaps surprisingly, LNSE calculations based on a monochromatic (single frequency) assumption yield a good agreement even though higher harmonics and their nonlinear interaction (Reynolds stresses) are not negligible. However, the leading Reynolds stresses do not force the mixing layer efficiently, as shown by a comparison with the optimal volume forcing obtained in a resolvent analysis. Thus, they cannot fully benefit from the potential for amplification available in the flow. Finally, the sensitivity of the optimal harmonic forcing at the cavity end is computed with an adjoint method. The sensitivities to mean flow modification and to a localised feedback (structural sensitivity) both identify the upstream cavity corner as the region where a small-amplitude modification has the strongest effect. This can guide in a systematic way the design of strategies for the control of amplification and saturation mechanisms.