The MOSDEF survey: a stellar mass-SFR-metallicity relation exists at $z\sim2.3$
Ryan L. Sanders, Alice E. Shapley, Mariska Kriek, William R. Freeman,, Naveen A. Reddy, Brian Siana, Alison L. Coil, Bahram Mobasher, Romeel Dav\'e,, Irene Shivaei, Mojegan Azadi, Sedona H. Price, Gene Leung, Tara Fetherholf,, Laura de Groot, Tom Zick, Francesca M. Fornasini

TL;DR
This study confirms a stellar mass-SFR-metallicity relation at redshift 2.3, showing evolution compared to local galaxies, and provides insights into galaxy chemical evolution at high redshift.
Contribution
First analysis of the M$_*$-SFR-Z relation at $z\sim2.3$ using multiple emission-line ratios, confirming its existence and evolutionary trends.
Findings
A clear M$_*$-SFR-Z relation exists at $z\sim2.3$.
High-redshift galaxies have lower metallicity at fixed M$_*$ and SFR compared to local galaxies.
Evolution suggests increased mass-loading factors and decreased metallicity of infalling gas at high redshift.
Abstract
We investigate the nature of the relation among stellar mass, star-formation rate, and gas-phase metallicity (the M-SFR-Z relation) at high redshifts using a sample of 260 star-forming galaxies at from the MOSDEF survey. We present an analysis of the high-redshift M-SFR-Z relation based on several emission-line ratios for the first time. We show that a M-SFR-Z relation clearly exists at . The strength of this relation is similar to predictions from cosmological hydrodynamical simulations. By performing a direct comparison of stacks of and galaxies, we find that galaxies have dex lower metallicity at fixed M and SFR. In the context of chemical evolution models, this evolution of the M-SFR-Z relation suggests an increase with redshift of the mass-loading factor at fixed M, as well as a decrease in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
