
TL;DR
This paper emphasizes the importance of integrating economic design and computational complexity, advocating for mutual understanding between social sciences and complexity theory to enhance interdisciplinary collaboration.
Contribution
It provides an overview of how computational complexity theorists view the world, aiming to bridge understanding between complexity theory and social sciences.
Findings
Highlights the need for interdisciplinary understanding
Encourages collaboration between social sciences and complexity theory
Provides insights into the worldview of complexity theorists
Abstract
We believe that economic design and computational complexity---while already important to each other---should become even more important to each other with each passing year. But for that to happen, experts in on the one hand such areas as social choice, economics, and political science and on the other hand computational complexity will have to better understand each other's worldviews. This article, written by two complexity theorists who also work in computational social choice theory, focuses on one direction of that process by presenting a brief overview of how most computational complexity theorists view the world. Although our immediate motivation is to make the lens through which complexity theorists see the world be better understood by those in the social sciences, we also feel that even within computer science it is very important for nontheoreticians to understand how…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Philosophy and History of Science
