TL;DR
This paper introduces Optimistic Mirror Descent (OMD) for training Wasserstein GANs, addressing limit cycling issues, and demonstrates improved convergence and performance over traditional methods in both theoretical and practical settings.
Contribution
It proposes OMD for WGAN training, proves its convergence in zero-sum games, and introduces Optimistic Adam, showing empirical improvements over existing algorithms.
Findings
OMD addresses limit cycling in WGAN training.
Models trained with OMD have smaller KL divergence.
Optimistic Adam improves CIFAR10 performance.
Abstract
We address the issue of limit cycling behavior in training Generative Adversarial Networks and propose the use of Optimistic Mirror Decent (OMD) for training Wasserstein GANs. Recent theoretical results have shown that optimistic mirror decent (OMD) can enjoy faster regret rates in the context of zero-sum games. WGANs is exactly a context of solving a zero-sum game with simultaneous no-regret dynamics. Moreover, we show that optimistic mirror decent addresses the limit cycling problem in training WGANs. We formally show that in the case of bi-linear zero-sum games the last iterate of OMD dynamics converges to an equilibrium, in contrast to GD dynamics which are bound to cycle. We also portray the huge qualitative difference between GD and OMD dynamics with toy examples, even when GD is modified with many adaptations proposed in the recent literature, such as gradient penalty or…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsAdam · Convolution · Wasserstein GAN
