The MOSDEF Survey: Direct Observational Constraints on the Ionizing Photon Production Efficiency, $\xi_{\rm ion}$, at z~2
Irene Shivaei, Naveen A. Reddy, Brian Siana, Alice E. Shapley, Mariska, Kriek, Bahram Mobasher, William R. Freeman, Ryan L. Sanders, Alison L. Coil,, Sedona H. Price, Tara Fetherolf, Mojegan Azadi, Gene Leung, Tom Zick

TL;DR
This study uses spectroscopic and photometric data from 673 galaxies at z~2 to measure the ionizing photon production efficiency, revealing its dependence on galaxy properties and implications for cosmic reionization.
Contribution
It provides the first large-sample observational constraints on xi_ion at z~2, highlighting galaxy-to-galaxy variations and the impact of dust and stellar populations.
Findings
Average log(xi_ion) ≈ 25.06-25.34 Hz erg$^{-1}$
Higher xi_ion in galaxies with high ionization states and blue UV slopes
Dust attenuation introduces ~0.3 dex systematic uncertainty
Abstract
We combine spectroscopic measurements of H and H and UV continuum photometry for a sample of 673 galaxies from the MOSFIRE Deep Evolution Field survey to constrain hydrogen ionizing photon production efficiencies (, xi_ion) at z=1.4-2.6. We find average log(xi_ion/[Hz erg])=25.06 (25.34), assuming the Calzetti (SMC) curve for the UV dust correction and a scatter of 0.28 dex in xi_ion distribution. After accounting for observational uncertainties and variations in dust attenuation, we conclude that the remaining scatter in xi_ion is likely dominated by galaxy-to-galaxy variations in stellar populations, including the slope and upper-mass cutoff of the initial mass function, stellar metallicity, star-formation burstiness, and stellar evolution (e.g., single/binary star evolution). Moreover, xi_ion is elevated in galaxies with high ionization states…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
