At the Roots of Dictionary Compression: String Attractors

TL;DR

This paper introduces the concept of string attractors as a unifying framework for dictionary compression techniques, providing new insights, complexity results, and optimal data structures for random access in compressed texts.

Contribution

It formalizes string attractors, establishes their relation to existing dictionary compressors, and develops optimal data structures for random access supporting all these schemes.

Findings

String attractors unify various dictionary compression methods.

Deciding small k-attractors is NP-complete for k≥3.

A universal data structure supports optimal random access for all schemes.

Abstract

A well-known fact in the field of lossless text compression is that high-order entropy is a weak model when the input contains long repetitions. Motivated by this, decades of research have generated myriads of so-called dictionary compressors: algorithms able to reduce the text's size by exploiting its repetitiveness. Lempel-Ziv 77 is one of the most successful and well-known tools of this kind, followed by straight-line programs, run-length Burrows-Wheeler transform, macro schemes, collage systems, and the compact directed acyclic word graph. In this paper, we show that these techniques are different solutions to the same, elegant, combinatorial problem: to find a small set of positions capturing all text's substrings. We call such a set a string attractor. We first show reductions between dictionary compressors and string attractors. This gives the approximation ratios of dictionary compressors with respect to the smallest string attractor and uncovers new relations between the output sizes of different compressors. We show that the $k$-attractor problem: deciding whether a text has a size-$t$ set of positions capturing substrings of length at most $k$, is NP-complete for $k\geq 3$. We provide several approximation techniques for the smallest $k$-attractor, show that the problem is APX-complete for constant $k$, and give strong inapproximability results. To conclude, we provide matching lower and upper bounds for the random access problem on string attractors. The upper bound is proved by showing a data structure supporting queries in optimal time. Our data structure is universal: by our reductions to string attractors, it supports random access on any dictionary-compression scheme. In particular, it matches the lower bound also on LZ77, straight-line programs, collage systems, and macro schemes, and therefore closes (at once) the random access problem for all these compressors.