Strain-driven attenuation of superconductivity in heteroepitaxial perovskite/YBCO/perovskite thin films
H. Zhang, A. Nguyen, T. Gredig, and J. Y.T. Wei

TL;DR
This study investigates how heteroepitaxial strain, rather than magnetism, causes suppression of superconductivity in thin YBCO layers within various perovskite heterostructures, revealing strain as the key factor affecting $T_c$.
Contribution
It demonstrates that heteroepitaxial strain, not magnetic proximity effects, is primarily responsible for superconductivity attenuation in $c$-axis YBCO heterostructures.
Findings
Superconducting $T_c$ decreases with thinner YBCO layers.
Strain, not magnetism, drives $T_c$ suppression.
Long-range $T_c$ attenuation is linked to heteroepitaxial strain.
Abstract
To distinguish between the effects of strain and magnetism on the superconductivity in -axis LaCaMnO/YBaCuO (LCMO/YBCO) heterostructures, we study perovskite/YBCO/perovskite thin films using either ferromagnetic LCMO or paramagnetic LaNiO (LNO) as perovskite. For a lattice-symmetry matched comparison, we also use orthorhombic PrBaCuO (PBCO) in place of the pseudocubic perovskites. Unlike PBCO/YBCO/PBCO, both LCMO/YBCO/LCMO and LNO/YBCO/LNO trilayers show strong attenuation of the superconducting as YBCO layer thickness is reduced from 21.4 to 5.4 nm. Our results indicate that heteroepitaxial strain, rather than long-range proximity effect, is responsible for the long length scales of attenuation observed in -axis LCMO/YBCO heterostructures.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Superconducting Materials and Applications
