High scale impact in alignment and decoupling in two-Higgs doublet models
Philipp Basler, Pedro M. Ferreira, Margarete M\"uhlleitner, Rui Santos

TL;DR
This paper investigates how high-energy scale behavior influences the decoupling and alignment limits in two-Higgs doublet models, revealing that theoretical and experimental constraints favor decoupling, especially in type II models, while allowing more deviation in type I.
Contribution
It provides a detailed RGE analysis showing how high-scale validity constrains quartic couplings and decoupling in 2HDMs, clarifying differences between type I and type II models.
Findings
Type II 2HDM naturally favors decoupling due to high-scale constraints.
Wrong-sign scenario in type II is excluded by combined theoretical and B-physics bounds.
Type I 2HDM can significantly deviate from alignment, with decoupling possible if the scalar is heavier than 500 GeV.
Abstract
The two-Higgs doublet model (2HDM) provides an excellent benchmark to study physics beyond the Standard Model (SM). In this work we discuss how the behaviour of the model at high energy scales causes it to have a scalar with properties very similar to those of the SM -- which means the 2HDM can be seen to naturally favor a decoupling or alignment limit. For a type II 2HDM, we show that requiring the model to be theoretically valid up to a scale of 1 TeV, by studying the renormalization group equations (RGE) of the parameters of the model, causes a significant reduction in the allowed magnitude of the quartic couplings. This, combined with -physics bounds, forces the model to be naturally decoupled. As a consequence, any non-decoupling limits in type II, like the wrong-sign scenario, are excluded. On the contrary, even with the very constraining limits for the Higgs couplings from the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
