Non-ideal magnetohydrodynamics on a moving mesh
Federico Marinacci (1), Mark Vogelsberger (1), Rahul Kannan (1,2),, Philip Mocz (3), R\"udiger Pakmor (4), Volker Springel (4,5,6) ((1) MIT,, (2) Harvard, (3) Princeton, (4) HITS, (5) ARI, (6) MPA)

TL;DR
This paper introduces new numerical schemes for non-ideal magnetohydrodynamics with resistivity in the moving-mesh code AREPO, enabling more realistic simulations of astrophysical systems where ideal MHD assumptions fail.
Contribution
The authors develop and validate explicit and implicit resistivity schemes for non-ideal MHD in AREPO, expanding the code's capabilities beyond ideal MHD approximations.
Findings
Implementation recovers analytic solutions with second-order accuracy.
Resistivity influences magnetic reconnection and gas dynamics in astrophysical simulations.
New methods enable studying complex MHD phenomena beyond ideal assumptions.
Abstract
In certain astrophysical systems the commonly employed ideal magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) approximation breaks down. Here, we introduce novel explicit and implicit numerical schemes of ohmic resistivity terms in the moving-mesh code AREPO. We include these non-ideal terms for two MHD techniques: the Powell 8-wave formalism and a constrained transport scheme, which evolves the cell-centred magnetic vector potential. We test our implementation against problems of increasing complexity, such as one- and two-dimensional diffusion problems, and the evolution of progressive and stationary Alfv\'en waves. On these test problems, our implementation recovers the analytic solutions to second-order accuracy. As first applications, we investigate the tearing instability in magnetized plasmas and the gravitational collapse of a rotating magnetized gas cloud. In both systems, resistivity plays a key…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
