Doping Li-rich cathode material Li$_2$MnO$_3$: Interplay between lattice site preference, electronic structure, and delithiation mechanism
Khang Hoang

TL;DR
This study uses first-principles calculations to explore how various dopants affect the electronic structure, site preference, and delithiation mechanism in Li$_2$MnO$_3$, revealing pathways to enhance battery cathode performance.
Contribution
It provides detailed insights into dopant site preferences and their impact on the oxidation mechanisms in Li$_2$MnO$_3$, guiding the design of high-capacity cathode materials.
Findings
Ni, Mo, Ru dopants favor transition-metal oxidation before oxygen during delithiation.
Dopants provide charge compensation and electronic conduction, enabling oxygen oxidation.
Dopant site preference can be tuned by synthesis conditions.
Abstract
We report a detailed first-principles study of doping in LiMnO, in both the dilute doping limit and heavy doping, using hybrid density-functional calculations. We find that Al, Fe, Mo, and Ru impurities are energetically most favorable when incorporated into LiMnO at the Mn site, whereas Mg is most favorable when doped at the Li sites. Ni, on the other hand, can be incorporated at the Li site and/or the Mn site, and the distribution of Ni over the lattice sites can be tuned by tuning the materials preparation conditions. There is a strong interplay between the lattice site preference and charge and spin states of the dopant, the electronic structure of the doped material, and the delithiation mechanism. The calculated electronic structure and voltage profile indicate that, in Ni-, Mo-, or Ru-doped LiMnO, oxidation occurs on the electrochemically active…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
