Electro-optomechanical equivalent circuits for quantum transduction
Emil Zeuthen, Albert Schliesser, Jacob M. Taylor, Anders S., S{\o}rensen

TL;DR
This paper introduces an equivalent circuit formalism for electro-optomechanical transducers, enabling intuitive analysis, design optimization, and quantum characterization of hybrid systems bridging microwave and optical frequencies.
Contribution
It develops a unified impedance-based circuit model for electro-optomechanical transducers, applicable to static and dynamic regimes, facilitating better understanding and optimization of quantum transduction devices.
Findings
Provides a complete quantum mechanical scattering matrix for transducers.
Unifies the transducer description within electrical engineering circuit analysis.
Applicable beyond the resolved-sideband regime, for arbitrary linear circuits.
Abstract
Using the techniques of optomechanics, a high- mechanical oscillator may serve as a link between electromagnetic modes of vastly different frequencies. This approach has successfully been exploited for the frequency conversion of classical signals and has the potential of performing quantum state transfer between superconducting circuitry and a traveling optical signal. Such transducers are often operated in a linear regime, where the hybrid system can be described using linear response theory based on the Heisenberg-Langevin equations. While mathematically straightforward to solve, this approach yields little intuition about the dynamics of the hybrid system to aid the optimization of the transducer. As an analysis and design tool for such electro-optomechanical transducers, we introduce an equivalent circuit formalism, where the entire transducer is represented by an electrical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
