Confirming chemical clocks: asteroseismic age dissection of the Milky Way disk(s)
V. Silva Aguirre, M. Bojsen-Hansen, D. Slumstrup, L. Casagrande, D., Kawata, I. Ciuca, R. Handberg, M.N. Lund, J.R. Mosumgaard, D. Huber, J.A., Johnson, M.H. Pinsonneault, A.M. Serenelli, D. Stello, J. Tayar, J.C. Bird,, S. Cassisi, M. Hon, M. Martig, P.E. Nissen, H.W. Rix

TL;DR
This study uses asteroseismic ages and chemical analysis of red giant stars to dissect the Milky Way disk's formation history, revealing distinct populations with different ages, chemical compositions, and kinematic properties.
Contribution
It provides the first large-scale asteroseismic age dissection of the Milky Way disk, distinguishing between low- and high-alpha populations and their formation timelines.
Findings
High-alpha stars are older with distinct kinematics.
No tight age-metallicity relation for high-alpha stars.
Young alpha-rich stars likely result from stellar mergers.
Abstract
Investigations of the origin and evolution of the Milky Way disk have long relied on chemical and kinematic identification of its components to reconstruct our Galactic past. Difficulties in determining precise stellar ages have restricted most studies to small samples, normally confined to the solar neighbourhood. Here we break this impasse with the help of asteroseismic inference and perform a chronology of the evolution of the disk throughout the age of the Galaxy. We chemically dissect the Milky Way disk population using a sample of red giant stars spanning out to 2~kpc in the solar annulus observed by the {\it Kepler} satellite, with the added dimension of asteroseismic ages. Our results reveal a clear difference in age between the low- and high- populations, which also show distinct velocity dispersions in the and components. We find no tight correlation between…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
