$\mathbf{Z}_{n}$ clock models and chains of $so(n)_2$ non-Abelian anyons: symmetries, integrable points and low energy properties
Peter E. Finch, Michael Flohr, Holger Frahm

TL;DR
This paper explores the deep connections between $ extbf{Z}_n$ clock models and chains of non-Abelian anyons from $so(n)_2$ fusion categories, revealing shared symmetries, integrable points, and low-energy conformal field theories through analytical and numerical methods.
Contribution
It establishes a detailed correspondence between $ extbf{Z}_n$ clock models and $so(n)_2$ anyon chains, including their symmetries, integrability, and low-energy effective theories, extending understanding of topological quantum models.
Findings
Shared algebraic structures underlying integrability.
Mapping of energy spectra between models.
Identification of conformal field theories describing low-energy limits.
Abstract
We study two families of quantum models which have been used previously to investigate the effect of topological symmetries in one-dimensional correlated matter. Various striking similarities are observed between certain quantum clock models, spin chains generalizing the Ising model, and chains of non-Abelian anyons constructed from the fusion category for odd , both subject to periodic boundary conditions. In spite of the differences between these two types of quantum chains, e.g.\ their Hilbert spaces being spanned by tensor products of local spin states or fusion paths of anyons, the symmetries of the lattice models are shown to be closely related. Furthermore, under a suitable mapping between the parameters describing the interaction between spins and anyons the respective Hamiltonians share part of their energy spectrum (although their degeneracies may…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
