Phylogenetic flexibility via Hall-type inequalities and submodularity
Katharina T. Huber, Vincent Moulton, Mike Steel

TL;DR
This paper characterizes when collections of subsets of species are compatible with a single phylogenetic tree, introducing a polynomial-time method to verify this 'slim' condition, which ensures the applicability of supertree methods in phylogenetics.
Contribution
It establishes a polynomial-time algorithm for testing the 'slim' condition, linking it to Hall-type inequalities and submodularity, and characterizes 'thin' sets as those compatible with a caterpillar tree.
Findings
'Slim' collections satisfy a Hall-type inequality.
Polynomial-time algorithm for testing 'slim' condition.
'Thin' sets correspond to bipartite forests.
Abstract
Given a collection of subsets of a finite set , we say that is {\em phylogenetically flexible} if, for any collection of rooted phylogenetic trees whose leaf sets comprise the collection , is compatible (i.e. there is a rooted phylogenetic --tree that displays each tree in ). We show that is phylogenetically flexible if and only if it satisfies a Hall-type inequality condition of being `slim'. Using submodularity arguments, we show that there is a polynomial-time algorithm for determining whether or not is slim. This `slim' condition reduces to a simpler inequality in the case where all of the sets in have size 3, a property we call `thin'. Thin sets were recently shown to be equivalent to the existence of an (unrooted) tree for which the median function provides an injective mapping to its vertex set; we show here that the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
