Localizing Finite-Depth Kripke Models
Mojtaba Mojtahedi

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that in finite-depth Kripke models, classical truth aligns with non-classical Kripke truth via Friedman's translation, with applications to Heyting Arithmetic models.
Contribution
It establishes an equivalence between classical and Kripke semantics for finite-depth models using Friedman's translation, extending previous results.
Findings
Classical truth in finite-depth models equals Kripke truth of Friedman's translation.
Semi-narrow Kripke models of HA are locally PA.
Provides applications for model localization techniques.
Abstract
We can look at a first-order (or propositional) intuitionistic Kripke model as an ordered set of classical models. In this paper, we show that for a finite-depth Kripke model in an arbitrary first-order language or propositional language, local (classical) truth of a formula is equivalent to non-classical truth (truth in the Kripke semantics) of a Friedman's translation of that formula, i.e. . We introduce some applications of this fact. We extend the result of [Ardeshir and Hessam 2002] and show that semi-narrow Kripke models of Heyting Arithmetic are locally .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
