All the noncontextuality inequalities for arbitrary prepare-and-measure experiments with respect to any fixed sets of operational equivalences
David Schmid, Robert W. Spekkens, Elie Wolfe

TL;DR
This paper develops a comprehensive algorithmic framework to derive all noncontextuality inequalities for finite prepare-and-measure experiments, enabling complete characterization of noncontextual models and their quantum representations.
Contribution
It introduces a systematic method to generate necessary and sufficient noncontextuality inequalities based on operational equivalences, applicable to any finite experiment scenario.
Findings
The space of noncontextual data forms a polytope.
The method provides necessary and sufficient conditions for noncontextual models.
Efficient algorithms for testing noncontextuality in experimental data.
Abstract
Within the framework of generalized noncontextuality, we introduce a general technique for systematically deriving noncontextuality inequalities for any experiment involving finitely many preparations and finitely many measurements, each of which has a finite number of outcomes. Given any fixed sets of operational equivalences among the preparations and among the measurements as input, the algorithm returns a set of noncontextuality inequalities whose satisfaction is necessary and sufficient for a set of operational data to admit of a noncontextual model. Additionally, we show that the space of noncontextual data tables always defines a polytope. Finally, we provide a computationally efficient means for testing whether any set of numerical data admits of a noncontextual model, with respect to any fixed operational equivalences. Together, these techniques provide complete methods for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
