The Mass Growth and Stellar Ages of Galaxies: Observations versus Simulations
Allison R. Hill, Adam Muzzin, Marijn Franx, Danilo Marchesini

TL;DR
This study compares observed galaxy stellar mass growth and ages with simulations, revealing that semi-analytic models better match observations than hydrodynamical simulations, especially regarding mass-dependent formation timescales.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed comparison of observed galaxy mass assembly histories with predictions from hydrodynamical and semi-analytic simulations, highlighting their differences.
Findings
Massive galaxies form a higher fraction of stars ex-situ.
Observed formation timescales increase with galaxy mass.
Semi-analytic models align better with observations than hydrodynamical simulations.
Abstract
Using observed stellar mass functions out to , we measure the main progenitor stellar mass growth of descendant galaxies with masses of at using an evolving cumulative number density selection. From these mass growth histories, we are able to measure the time at which half the total stellar mass of the descendant galaxy was assembled, , which, in order of decreasing mass corresponds to redshifts of and . We compare this to the median light-weighted stellar age ( and ) of a sample of low redshift SDSS galaxies (from the literature) and find the timescales are consistent with more massive galaxies forming a higher fraction of their stars ex-situ compared to lower mass descendants. We find that both and strongly correlate with mass which…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
