Linear regression model with a randomly censored predictor:Estimation procedures
Folefac Atem, Roland A. Matsouaka

TL;DR
This paper evaluates various estimation methods for linear regression models with randomly censored covariates, comparing their efficiency and bias through simulations and real data application.
Contribution
It adapts existing estimation methods to handle random censoring in covariates and compares their performance under different scenarios.
Findings
Parametric, semiparametric, and nonparametric methods vary in bias and efficiency.
Simulation results highlight the impact of censoring mechanisms on estimation accuracy.
Application to Framingham data demonstrates practical differences among methods.
Abstract
We consider linear regression model estimation where the covariate of interest is randomly censored. Under a non-informative censoring mechanism, one may obtain valid estimates by deleting censored observations. However, this comes at a cost of lost information and decreased efficiency, especially under heavy censoring. Other methods for dealing with censored covariates, such as ignoring censoring or replacing censored observations with a fixed number, often lead to severely biased results and are of limited practicality. Parametric methods based on maximum likelihood estimation as well as semiparametric and non-parametric methods have been successfully used in linear regression estimation with censored covariates where censoring is due to a limit of detection. In this paper, we adapt some of these methods to handle randomly censored covariates and compare them under different…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
