Hausdorff Measure: Lost in Translation
Alexey A. Tuzhilin

TL;DR
This paper explores a novel approach to defining Hausdorff measure using only countable coverings and discusses how different interpretations of 'countable set' can lead to contradictions in mathematical theory.
Contribution
It introduces a new definition of Hausdorff measure allowing empty coverings and analyzes the impact of varying interpretations of 'countable set' on measure theory.
Findings
Hausdorff measure can be defined with only countable coverings and empty elements
Different interpretations of 'countable set' can cause contradictions in measure theory
The paper clarifies the implications of these interpretations for mathematical consistency
Abstract
In the present article we describe how one can define Hausdorff measure allowing empty elements in coverings, and using infinite countable coverings only. In addition, we discuss how the use of different nonequivalent interpretations of the notion "countable set", that is typical for classical and modern mathematics, may lead to contradictions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis · Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
