Toward the analysis of JWST exoplanet spectra: Identifying troublesome model parameters
Jean-Loup Baudino, Paul Molliere, Olivia Venot, Pascal Tremblin, Bruno, Bezard, and Pierre-Olivier Lagage

TL;DR
This paper compares three 1D radiative-convective models for exoplanet atmospheres to assess uncertainties in interpreting JWST spectra, highlighting the importance of molecular line lists and chemical modeling choices.
Contribution
It introduces a benchmarking protocol for exoplanet atmosphere models, compares different models and line lists, and discusses implications for JWST spectral analysis.
Findings
Differences in molecular line lists can exceed JWST observational uncertainties.
Uncertainties in line shapes impact spectral predictions more than expected JWST errors.
Chemical models show minimal differences in spectra, but chemistry assumptions affect interpretations.
Abstract
Given the forthcoming launch of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) which will allow observ- ing exoplanet atmospheres with unprecedented signal-over-noise ratio, spectral coverage and spatial resolution, the uncertainties in the atmosphere modelling used to interpret the data need to be as- sessed. As the first step, we compare three independent 1D radiative-convective models: ATMO, Exo-REM and petitCODE. We identify differences in physical and chemical processes taken into ac- count thanks to a benchmark protocol we developed. We study the impact of these differences on the analysis of observable spectra. We show the importance of selecting carefully relevant molecular linelists to compute the atmospheric opacity. Indeed, differences between spectra calculated with Hitran and ExoMol exceed the expected uncertainties of future JWST observations. We also show the limitation in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
