Evidence for the formation of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko through gravitational collapse of a bound clump of pebbles
J\"urgen Blum, Bastian Gundlach, Maya Krause, Marco Fulle, Anders, Johansen, Jessica Agarwal, Ingo von Borstel, Xian Shi, Xuanyu Hu, Mark S., Bentley, Fabrizio Capaccioni, Luigi Colangeli, Vincenzo Della Corte, Nicolas, Fougere, Simon F. Green, Stavro Ivanovski, Thurid Mannel

TL;DR
This study provides evidence that comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko formed through the gravitational collapse of a bound clump of dust pebbles and ice particles, aligning with observations from the Rosetta mission.
Contribution
It is the first to link comet formation to pebble gravitational collapse, supported by comprehensive Rosetta data and implications for planetesimal formation theories.
Findings
Comet 67P likely formed from pebble clumps.
The comet's properties match predictions of pebble collapse models.
Pebbles in protoplanetary disks are building blocks for comets.
Abstract
The processes that led to the formation of the planetary bodies in the Solar System are still not fully understood. Using the results obtained with the comprehensive suite of instruments on-board ESA's Rosetta mission, we present evidence that comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko likely formed through the gentle gravitational collapse of a bound clump of mm-sized dust aggregates ("pebbles"), intermixed with microscopic ice particles. This formation scenario leads to a cometary make-up that is simultaneously compatible with the global porosity, homogeneity, tensile strength, thermal inertia, vertical temperature profiles, sizes and porosities of emitted dust, and the steep increase in water-vapour production rate with decreasing heliocentric distance, measured by the instruments on-board the Rosetta spacecraft and the Philae lander. Our findings suggest that the pebbles observed to be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
