TL;DR
This paper introduces a generic differential equation-based method to transform hazard estimates into more interpretable scales, addressing causal interpretation issues and enabling efficient calculation of various parameters from hazard models.
Contribution
It provides a novel, general approach for transforming hazard estimates to avoid built-in selection effects, with consistent covariance estimation and practical examples.
Findings
Transformations are consistent and reliable in simulations.
Covariance estimates enable rapid confidence interval calculations.
Method generalizes the relation between Nelson-Aalen and Kaplan-Meier estimators.
Abstract
Time to event outcomes are often evaluated on the hazard scale, but interpreting hazards may be difficult. Recently, there has been concern in the causal inference literature that hazards actually have a built in selection-effect that prevents simple causal interpretations. This is even a problem in randomized controlled trials, where hazard ratios have become a standard measure of treatment effects. Modeling on the hazard scale is nevertheless convenient, e.g. to adjust for covariates. Using hazards for intermediate calculations may therefore be desirable. Here, we provide a generic method for transforming hazard estimates consistently to other scales at which these built in selection effects are avoided. The method is based on differential equations, and generalize a well known relation between the Nelson-Aalen and Kaplan-Meier estimators. Using the martingale central limit theorem we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
