Comment on "Generalization of the Kohn-Sham system that can represent arbitrary one-electron density matrices"
Mario Piris, Katarzyna Pernal

TL;DR
This paper critically examines van Dam's claims that a single-determinant wavefunction can represent any one-electron density matrix and that Koopmans theorem applies in 1RDM functional theory, providing counterarguments.
Contribution
The authors refute van Dam's claims by demonstrating that his assertions about representing arbitrary 1RDMs and applying Koopmans theorem are incorrect.
Findings
van Dam's claim about representing arbitrary 1RDMs is unfounded
van Dam's application of Koopmans theorem in 1RDMFT is invalid
The paper clarifies limitations of 1RDM functional theory
Abstract
Hubertus J. J. van Dam [Phys. Rev. A 93, 052512, 2016] claims that the one-particle reduced density matrix (1RDM) of an interacting system can be represented by means of a single-determinant wavefunction of fictitious non-interacting particles. van Dam introduced orbitals within a mean-field framework that produce energy levels similar to Hartree-Fock (HF) orbital energies, therefore he also claims that conventional analyses based on Koopmans theorem are possible in 1RDM functional theory (1RDMFT). In this comment, we demonstrate that both claims are unfounded.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
