Comparison of statistical procedures for Gaussian graphical model selection
Ivan Grechikhin

TL;DR
This paper compares various statistical procedures for Gaussian graphical model selection, evaluating their performance using measures like Type I/II errors and ROC AUC to identify the most effective methods for different scenarios.
Contribution
It provides a systematic comparison of multiple procedures for Gaussian graphical model selection, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses.
Findings
Different procedures vary significantly in error rates and ROC AUC.
Some methods outperform others depending on the specific measure used.
The study guides choosing appropriate procedures based on application needs.
Abstract
Graphical models are used in a variety of problems to uncover hidden structures. There is a huge number of different identification procedures, constructed for different purposes. However, it is important to research different properties of such procedures and compare them in order to find out the best procedure or the best use case for some specific procedure. In this paper, some statistical identification procedures are compared using different measures, such as Type I and Type II errors, ROC AUC.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSoil Geostatistics and Mapping · Advanced Statistical Methods and Models · Machine Learning and Data Classification
