Near-domination in graphs
Bruce Reed, Alex Scott, Paul Seymour

TL;DR
This paper investigates the properties of t-dominating graphs, showing they are structurally close to 0-dominating graphs, and explores related concepts and conjectures in graph theory.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of t-dominating graphs and proves they are close to 0-dominating graphs, extending understanding of domination properties in graphs.
Findings
t-dominating graphs are close to 0-dominating graphs
the analogous statement for digraphs does not hold
discusses connections with the Erdos-Hajnal conjecture
Abstract
A vertex u of a graph t-dominates a vertex v if there are at most t vertices different from u,v that are adjacent to v and not to u; and a graph is t-dominating if for every pair of distinct vertices, one of them t-dominates the other. Our main result says that if a graph is t-dominating, then it is close (in an appropriate sense) to being 0-dominating. We also show that an analogous statement for digraphs is false; and discuss some connections with the Erdos-Hajnal conjecture.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Theory Research · Limits and Structures in Graph Theory · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
