Weak lensing magnification of SpARCS galaxy clusters
A. Tudorica, H. Hildebrandt, M. Tewes, H. Hoekstra, C.B. Morrison, A., Muzzin, G. Wilson, H.K.C. Yee, C. Lidman, A. Hicks, J. Nantais, T. Erben, R., F. J. van der Burg, R. Demarco

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that weak lensing magnification can effectively calibrate the mass-richness relation of high-redshift galaxy clusters up to z=1.4, providing a promising tool for cosmological research.
Contribution
It introduces the application of weak lensing magnification to calibrate cluster masses at high redshifts, expanding the methods available for cluster mass estimation.
Findings
Detected significant magnification signals up to 4.1σ for z>1.0 clusters.
Measured an average M200 of approximately 1.28×10^14 solar masses.
Confirmed the feasibility of using galaxy over-densities to identify massive high-redshift clusters.
Abstract
Measuring and calibrating relations between cluster observables is critical for resource-limited studies. The mass-richness relation of clusters offers an observationally inexpensive way of estimating masses. Its calibration is essential for cluster and cosmological studies, especially for high-redshift clusters. Weak gravitational lensing magnification is a promising and complementary method to shear studies, that can be applied at higher redshifts. We employed the weak lensing magnification method to calibrate the mass-richness relation up to a redshift of 1.4. We used the Spitzer Adaptation of the Red-Sequence Cluster Survey (SpARCS) galaxy cluster candidates () and optical data from the Canada France Hawaii Telescope (CFHT) to test whether magnification can be effectively used to constrain the mass of high-redshift clusters. Lyman-Break Galaxies (LBGs) selected using the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
