Improved constraints on H0 from a combined analysis of gravitational-wave and electromagnetic emission from GW170817
C. Guidorzi, R. Margutti, D. Brout, D. Scolnic, W. Fong, K. D., Alexander, P. S. Cowperthwaite, J. Annis, E. Berger, P. K. Blanchard, R., Chornock, D. L. Coppejans, T. Eftekhari, J. A. Frieman, D. Huterer, M., Nicholl, M. Soares-Santos, G. Terreran, V. A. Villar

TL;DR
This paper refines the measurement of the Hubble constant by modeling the afterglow emission of GW170817 to better constrain the system's inclination, leading to a more precise H0 estimate that aligns more closely with local measurements.
Contribution
The study introduces an improved method to constrain the inclination angle of GW170817 using broad-band afterglow modeling, enhancing the precision of H0 measurement from gravitational-wave data.
Findings
H0 estimated at 74.0 ± 11.5/7.5 km/s/Mpc with peculiar velocity uncertainty of 170 km/sec.
H0 estimated at 75.5 ± 11.6/9.6 km/s/Mpc with a more realistic peculiar velocity uncertainty of 250 km/sec.
Results show better agreement with local distance ladder measurements than Planck CMB estimates.
Abstract
The luminosity distance measurement of GW170817 derived from GW analysis in Abbott et al. 2017 (here, A17:H0) is highly correlated with the measured inclination of the NS-NS system. To improve the precision of the distance measurement, we attempt to constrain the inclination by modeling the broad-band X-ray-to-radio emission from GW170817, which is dominated by the interaction of the jet with the environment. We update our previous analysis and we consider the radio and X-ray data obtained at days since merger. We find that the afterglow emission from GW170817 is consistent with an off-axis relativistic jet with energy propagating into an environment with density , with preference for wider jets (opening angle deg). For these jets, our modeling indicates an off-axis angle…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
