On the waiting time in quantum repeaters with probabilistic entanglement swapping
E. Shchukin, F. Schmidt, P. van Loock

TL;DR
This paper introduces an exact, systematic method using Markov chains to calculate the average waiting time and transmission rates in quantum repeaters with probabilistic entanglement swapping, improving accuracy over previous approximations.
Contribution
It provides explicit rate formulas for up to four segments, explores flexible connection schemes, and proposes a recursive approach for large systems, enhancing rate bounds and understanding of waiting time statistics.
Findings
Exact rate formulas for up to four segments with arbitrary swapping probabilities.
Finite memory times significantly affect repeater performance.
Statistical analysis shows average waiting time alone is insufficient for small probabilities.
Abstract
The standard approach to realize a quantum repeater relies upon probabilistic but heralded entangled state manipulations and the storage of quantum states while waiting for successful events. In the literature on this class of repeaters, calculating repeater rates has typically depended on approximations assuming sufficiently small probabilities. Here we propose an exact and systematic approach including an algorithm based on Markov chain theory to compute the average waiting time (and hence the transmission rates) of quantum repeaters with arbitrary numbers of links. For up to four repeater segments, we explicitly give the exact rate formulae for arbitrary entanglement swapping probabilities. Starting with three segments, we explore schemes with arbitrary (not only doubling) and dynamical (not only predetermined) connections. The effect of finite memory times is also considered and the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
