Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam Survey for An Optical Counterpart of GW170817
Nozomu Tominaga, Masaomi Tanaka, Tomoki Morokuma, Yousuke Utsumi,, Masaki S. Yamaguchi, Naoki Yasuda, Masayuki Tanaka, Michitoshi Yoshida,, Takuya Fujiyoshi, Hisanori Furusawa, Koji S. Kawabata, Chien-Hsiu Lee,, Kentaro Motohara, Ryou Ohsawa, Kouji Ohta, Tsuyoshi Terai

TL;DR
This study conducted a $z$-band survey using Subaru/Hyper Suprime-Cam to identify the optical counterpart of GW170817, successfully pinpointing J-GEM17btc as the most probable candidate among 60 transients.
Contribution
First untargeted $z$-band survey covering 23.6 deg$^2$ for GW170817's optical counterpart, identifying J-GEM17btc as the most likely candidate.
Findings
J-GEM17btc has a 64% probability of being associated with GW170817.
Out of 60 candidates, only J-GEM17btc shows a high likelihood of association.
Other candidates are mostly coincident with extended objects in catalogs.
Abstract
We perform a -band survey for an optical counterpart of a binary neutron star coalescence GW170817 with Subaru/Hyper Suprime-Cam. Our untargeted transient search covers deg corresponding to the credible region of GW170817 and reaches the completeness magnitude of mag on average. As a result, we find 60 candidates of extragalactic transients, including J-GEM17btc (a.k.a. SSS17a/DLT17ck). While J-GEM17btc is associated with NGC 4993 that is firmly located inside the 3D skymap of GW170817, the other 59 candidates do not have distance information in the GLADE v2 catalog or NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED). Among 59 candidates, 58 are located at the center of extended objects in the Pan-STARRS1 catalog, while one candidate has an offset. We present location, -band apparent magnitude, and time variability of the candidates and evaluate the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
