An empirical limit on the kilonova rate from the DLT40 one day cadence Supernova Survey

TL;DR

This study uses the DLT40 supernova survey data to empirically constrain the rate of kilonovae, finding it to be lower than previous estimates and suggesting such events are rare in existing galaxy survey datasets.

Contribution

First empirical rate limit on kilonovae based on real observations from the DLT40 survey, utilizing the light curve of the event AT~2017gfo/DLT17ck.

Findings

Kilonova rate is less than 0.55 per 100 years per 10^{10} L_{B_{ullet}}.

Volume rate of kilonovae is less than 0.99 x 10^{-4} Mpc^{-3} yr^{-1}.

Kilonovae are unlikely to be hidden in old supernova search datasets.

Abstract

Binary neutron star mergers are important to understand stellar evolution, the chemical enrichment of the universe via the r-process, the physics of short gamma-ray bursts, gravitational waves and pulsars. The rates at which these coalescences happen is uncertain, but it can be constrained in different ways. One of those is to search for the optical transients produced at the moment of the merging, called a kilonova, in ongoing SN searches. However, until now, only theoretical models for kilonovae light curve were available to estimate their rates. The recent kilonova discovery AT~2017gfo/DLT17ck gives us the opportunity to constrain the rate of kilonovae using the light curve of a real event. We constrain the rate of binary neutron star mergers using the DLT40 Supernova search, and the native AT~2017gfo/DLT17ck light curve obtained with the same telescope and software system. Excluding AT~2017gfo/DLT17ck due to visibility issues, which was only discovered thanks to the aLIGO/aVirgo trigger, no other similar transients detected during 13 months of daily cadence observations of $\sim$ 2200 nearby ($<$40 Mpc) galaxies. We find that the rate of BNS mergers is lower than 0.47 - 0.55 kilonovae per 100 years per $10^{10}$ $L_{B_{\odot}}$ (depending on the adopted extinction distribution). In volume, this translates to $<0.99\times 10^{-4}\,_{-0.15}^{+0.19},\rm{Mpc^{-3}}\,\rm{yr^{-1}}$(SNe Ia-like extinction distribution), consistent with previous BNS coalescence rates. Based on our rate limit, and the sensitivity of aLIGO/aVirgo during O2, it is very unlikely that kilonova events are lurking in old pointed galaxy SN search datasets.